United States v. Roger Talbot Alvarado

444 F.2d 255, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9443
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 21, 1971·No. 26937_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alvarado appeals his conviction for refusing induction into the armed forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We affirm.

On April 21, 1967, Alvarado was mailed an order to report for induction on May 10, 1967. Thereafter, on April 27 he requested a copy of Selective Service Form 150 in order to claim a 1-0 deferment as a conscientious objector. The local board supplied the form, considered it upon return and concluded that re-opening was not required.

(1) Alvarado’s contention that the local board’s consideration of his request amounted to re-opening under Miller v. United States, 388 F.2d 973 (9th Cir. 1967) is without merit since the local board must give some consideration to his showing before it can determine whether it amounts to “circumstances beyond his control.” 32 C.F.R. § 1625.2. See United States v. Price, 427 F.2d 162, 163 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Bowen, 423 F.2d 266, 267 (9th Cir. 1969).

(2) His claim that the local board was required to re-open because he made a prima facie showing is foreclosed by Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Roger Talbot Alvarado, 444 F.2d 255, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9443 (9th Cir. 1971).

444 F.2d 255 (United States v. Roger Talbot Alvarado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dick Andrew Gee v. United States
452 F.2d 849 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)