United States v. Roger Henry Young
This text of 454 F.2d 1168 (United States v. Roger Henry Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roger Henry Young stands convicted of being a felon in possession of firearms, a violation of 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(a) (1). On appeal he urges reversal because the Government failed to prove that the firearm was “in commerce or affecting commerce.”
The Government, relying on previous decisions of this court, did not contend that evidence of or a finding of possession in or affecting commerce was essential to a verdict of guilty, and the district court ruled accordingly. However, on December 20, 1971, the Supreme Court in United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336, 92 S.Ct. 515, 30 L.Ed.2d 488, held that under Title VII of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(a) (1)) there must be “some demonstrated nexus with interstate commerce” before a conviction may be sustained. Id. at 349, 92 S.Ct. at 523.
Under the circumstances it is necessary that this case be remanded for further consideration in the light of Bass.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 F.2d 1168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roger-henry-young-ca9-1972.