United States v. Roger Campbell

30 F.3d 136, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26932, 1994 WL 399497
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 1994
Docket94-1365
StatusUnpublished

This text of 30 F.3d 136 (United States v. Roger Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Roger Campbell, 30 F.3d 136, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26932, 1994 WL 399497 (7th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

30 F.3d 136

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.
UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roger CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-1365.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued July 7, 1994.
Decided Aug. 2, 1994.

Before CUDAHY, FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Roger Campbell pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846, and one count of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956. The district court determined that Campbell was a career offender under Sentencing Guideline Sec. 4B1.1 and sentenced him to 262 months' imprisonment on the conspiracy conviction and 240 months' imprisonment on the money laundering conviction, the sentences to run concurrently.

Campbell's sole argument on appeal is that the Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority in including conspiracy to commit a controlled substance offense among the offenses which qualify a defendant for sentencing enhancement as a career offender under Guideline Sec. 4B1.1. See United States v. Price, 990 F.2d 1367 (D.C.Cir.1993). This argument has recently been rejected by a panel of this circuit in United States v. Damerville, No. 93-3235, slip op. at 3-7 (7th Cir. June 14, 1994). There is no basis to overrule or distinguish Damerville from this case. Campbell's sentence is affirmed for the reasons stated in Damerville. Damerville, No. 93-3235, slip op. at 3-7.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F.3d 136, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26932, 1994 WL 399497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roger-campbell-ca7-1994.