United States v. Roger Benson
This text of 363 F. App'x 483 (United States v. Roger Benson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Roger Benson appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for escape from custody, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Benson contends that the district court plainly erred when it failed to give him credit for the time served on an undis *484 charged concurrent state sentence, under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)(l).
Benson’s contention lacks merit because the state sentence did not result from “relevant conduct,” see U.S.S.G § 1B1.3, and was not used to increase Benson’s base offense level. Cf. United States v. Armstead, 552 F.3d 769, 783-84 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
363 F. App'x 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roger-benson-ca9-2010.