United States v. Roger Benson

363 F. App'x 483
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2010·No. 09-30166·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Roger Benson appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for escape from custody, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Benson contends that the district court plainly erred when it failed to give him credit for the time served on an undis *484 charged concurrent state sentence, under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)(l).

Benson’s contention lacks merit because the state sentence did not result from “relevant conduct,” see U.S.S.G § 1B1.3, and was not used to increase Benson’s base offense level. Cf. United States v. Armstead, 552 F.3d 769, 783-84 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Roger Benson, 363 F. App'x 483 (9th Cir. 2010).

363 F. App'x 483 (United States v. Roger Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benson v. United States
176 L. Ed. 2d 1239 (Supreme Court, 2010)