United States v. Rogelio Mora-Patino

617 F. App'x 359
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2015
Docket14-41064
StatusUnpublished

This text of 617 F. App'x 359 (United States v. Rogelio Mora-Patino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rogelio Mora-Patino, 617 F. App'x 359 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

*360 PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Rogelio Mora-Patino raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir.2015), petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015) (No. 1410355). In Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) for a prior conviction of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior offense required proof of remuneration or commercial activity.

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Juan Martinez-Lugo
782 F.3d 198 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 F. App'x 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rogelio-mora-patino-ca5-2015.