United States v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.
99 F. 552, 39 C.C.A. 651, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166
This text of 99 F. 552 (United States v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co., 99 F. 552, 39 C.C.A. 651, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166 (2d Cir. 1900).
Opinion
We concur with the judge who tried the cause in the circuit court that this zinc dust is an article in a crude state, used in dyeing, for the reasons given in his opinion. Coming liras within the enumeration of a paragraph on the free list, the provisions of sections 3 and 4 do not apply to it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leber & Meyer v. United States
135 F. 243 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1904)
United States v. Klipstein
113 F. 1021 (Second Circuit, 1902)
United States v. Klipstein
123 F. 996 (S.D. New York, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 F. 552, 39 C.C.A. 651, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roessler-hasslacher-chemical-co-ca2-1900.