United States v. Rodriquez
This text of United States v. Rodriquez (United States v. Rodriquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 04-30397 Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross- 04-30494 Appellant, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00142- GINO GONZAGA RODRIQUEZ, RHW Eastern Defendant-Appellant/Cross- Appellee. District of Washington, Spokane
ORDER
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed July 7, 2008
Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges, and Consuelo Marshall,* District Judge.
ORDER
This case is hereby resubmitted.
Pursuant to the judgment of the United States Supreme Court issued on May 19, 2008 in United States v. Rodriquez, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1783, we vacate our opinion at 464 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2006), vacate the district court’s decision, and remand to the district court for further proceedings con- sistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
*The Honorable Consuelo Marshall, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
8117 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rodriquez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriquez-ca9-2008.