United States v. Rodriguez-Olguin
This text of 177 F. App'x 491 (United States v. Rodriguez-Olguin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[492]*492Order
The principal issue presented by this appeal has been resolved recently by United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 442 F.3d 539 (7th Cir.2006), and United States v. Galicia-Cardenas, 443 F.3d 553 (7th Cir.2006). Although Rodriguez-Olguin contends that the district judge did not discuss adequately the question whether fast-track programs in other districts produce unacceptable disparity in sentencing, and therefore failed to consider the factors specified by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), there is no need to give either weight or extended treatment to a consideration that, we held in Martinez-Martinez and Galicia-Cardenas, does not justify a reduced sentence. The district court adequately considered those factors that matter to the sentence. See United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir.2005); United States v. Dean, 414 F.3d 725 (7th Cir.2005). The judgment therefore is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 F. App'x 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-olguin-ca7-2006.