United States v. Rodriguez-Naranjo

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007

No. 05-10137 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CELESTINA RODRIGUEZ-NARANJO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-51-2 --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Celestina Rodriguez-

Naranjo has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Rodriguez-Naranjo has not filed a response to counsel’s motion.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Rodriguez-Naranjo’s motion for the appointment of a

substitute attorney is DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.