United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2002·No. 01-21192·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21192 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

VALENTIN RODRIGUEZ-MORENO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-61-1 - - - - - - - - - - August 20, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender representing Valentin Rodriguez-

Moreno has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno (United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)