United States v. Rodriguez-Linares
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30777 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-LINARES,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CR-20017-ALL --------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro
Rodriguez-Linares (Rodriguez) has requested leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rodriguez-Linares (United States v. Rodriguez-Linares) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.