United States v. Rodriguez-Linares

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2006·No. 05-30777·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30777 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-LINARES,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CR-20017-ALL --------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro

Rodriguez-Linares (Rodriguez) has requested leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez-Linares, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Rodriguez-Linares (United States v. Rodriguez-Linares) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)