United States v. Rodriguez-Garcia
This text of United States v. Rodriguez-Garcia (United States v. Rodriguez-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40758 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE DANIEL RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-1018-ALL -------------------- April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Daniel Rodriguez-Garcia (Rodriguez) appeals the 27-
month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge
of being found in the United States after deportation, a
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
He argues that his indictment violates the Fifth and Sixth
Amendments because it does not allege general intent. As
Rodriguez concedes, however, his argument is foreclosed by Fifth
Circuit precedent. See United States v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d
233, 237-39 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 2600
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40758 -2-
(2001); see also United States v. Berrios-Centeno, 250 F.3d 294,
297-300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 288 (2001). He
raises the argument only to preserve it for Supreme Court review.
The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rodriguez-Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-garcia-ca5-2002.