United States v. Rodriguez-Flores

292 F. App'x 357
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rodriguez-Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 F. App'x 317
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 12, 2008·No. 06-10181·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

This court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal of Guillermo Rodriguez-Flores pursuant to An-ders v. California. 1 The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States. 2

We have reconsidered this matter in light of Gall. However, nothing in the Supreme Court’s Gall decision requires us to change our prior opinion in this case. 3 Accordingly, we reinstate the prior opinion. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). United States v. Rodriguez-Flores, 236 Fed.Appx. 138 (2007).

2

. 552 U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

3

. See U.S. v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 530 F.3d 381, 385-89 (5th Cir.2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez-Flores, 292 F. App'x 357 (5th Cir. 2008).

292 F. App'x 357 (United States v. Rodriguez-Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez
530 F.3d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)