United States v. Rodriguez

N.D. California

United States v. Rodriguez

27 F. Cas. 883

DecidedDecember 15, 1855

StatusPublished

This text of 27 F. Cas. 883 (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rodriguez, 27 F. Cas. 883 (N.D. Cal. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The grant in this case was made on the first day of May, 1839, by Governor Alvarado, to Antonio Bu-elna, the husband of the claimant. Buelna, after obtaining nis grant, appears by the proofs to have occupied and cultivated his land and continued to live there with his family until his decease. The present claimant, his widow, seems to be his sole heir. The United States have taken an appeal in this case, but it is submitted to us as usual without argument, or the statement of any objection to the validity of the claim. The genuineness of the grant seems to be fully proved, and the board have confirmed, the claim according to a judicial measurement, which on a resurvey has been found to include less than the quantity mentioned in the grant. We think the decree of the board should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The grant in this case was made on the first day of May, 1839, by Governor Alvarado, to Antonio Bu-elna, the husband of the claimant. Buelna, after obtaining nis grant, appears by the proofs to have occupied and cultivated his land and continued to live there with his family until his decease. The present claimant, his widow, seems to be his sole heir. The United States have taken an appeal in this case, but it is submitted to us as usual without argument, or the statement of any objection to the validity of the claim. The genuineness of the grant seems to be fully proved, and the board have confirmed, the claim according to a judicial measurement, which on a resurvey has been found to include less than the quantity mentioned in the grant. We think the decree of the board should be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 F. Cas. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-cand-1855.