United States v. Rodriguez
This text of United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00960-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 13 WHCHOUT PREJUDICE 14 | LUPE RODRIGUEZ, d/b/a LGP Ag Service, (ECF No. 11) 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff, United States of America, filed a notice of voluntary 19 | dismissal of entire action without prejudice. (ECF No. 11.) Defendants have not filed either an 20 | answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case has 21 | ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of 22 | San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to 23 | close this case. 24 95 IS SO ORDERED. 26| Dated: _ March 10, 2020 [Jee ey —— 07 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-caed-2020.