United States v. Rodriguez

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 11, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-00960·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00960-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 13 WHCHOUT PREJUDICE 14 | LUPE RODRIGUEZ, d/b/a LGP Ag Service, (ECF No. 11) 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff, United States of America, filed a notice of voluntary 19 | dismissal of entire action without prejudice. (ECF No. 11.) Defendants have not filed either an 20 | answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case has 21 | ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of 22 | San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to 23 | close this case. 24 26| Dated: _ March 10, 2020 [Jee ey —— 07 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)