United States v. Rodriguez
This text of United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 25-20406 Document: 45-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 25-20406 FILED February 23, 2026 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jorge Angel Rodriguez,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18-CR-447-1 ______________________________
Before Stewart, Graves, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Angel Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-20406 Document: 45-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2026
No. 25-20406
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-ca5-2026.