United States v. Rodriguez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 F.3d 182
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 12, 2000·No. 98-41545·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41545 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SANTOS RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (B-98-CR-402-04) -------------------- December 11, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant Santos

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Rodriguez was notified of counsel’s motion and brief but has not

filed a response to counsel’s motion. Both counsel’s brief and our

independent review of the record show that there are no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Consequently, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

S:\OPINIONS\UNPUB\98\98-41545.0 4/29/04 4:51 am

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)