United States v. Rodriguez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41124 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REFUGIO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Rogelio Saldana Jimenez,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-160-ALL -------------------- June 5, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Refugio
Rodriguez (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Rodriguez has received a copy of counsel's motion and
brief and has filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief, the record, and Rodriguez's response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. P. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.