United States v. Rodriguez
This text of United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. -1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20360 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELOISA RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-414-3 - - - - - - - - - - February 17, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Eloisa Rodriguez appeals her sentence following her
conviction on one count of possession of cocaine with the intent
to distribute. She argues that the district court clearly erred
by denying her a two-level downward adjustment in her offense
level based upon her minor role in the offense. We have reviewed
the record and the briefs of the parties, and we conclude that
the district court did not clearly err by denying Rodriguez the
sought after adjustment. See United States v. Zuniga, 18 F.3d
1254, 1261 (5th Cir. 1994). Her sentence is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-ca5-2000.