United States v. Rodriguez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 F.3d 117
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 1997·No. 96-11000·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-11000 Conference Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK ALLEN RODRIGUEZ, also known as Mark Blair,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-169-P - - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Allen Rodriguez appeals the revocation of his

supervised release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3).

Rodriguez contends that he was denied due process because the

district court considered undisclosed evidence in revoking his

supervised release and imposing a 24-month sentence. We have

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40912 -2-

reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find no

reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related