United States v. Rodriguez

Second Circuit

United States v. Rodriguez

120 F. App'x 411

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 496 F.3d 221 →

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 10, 2005·No. No. 03-1643·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), this Court has issued an opinion in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, No. 03-1675, 2005 WL 240916, 2005 U.S.App. LEXIS 1699 (2d Cir. Feb. 2, 2005), setting forth the procedure that we will normally follow with respect to appeals of criminal sentences rendered by district courts prior to Booker. Appellant is directed to submit to the Clerk of this Court by 5 p.m. on Monday, February 14, 2005, a one-page statement indicating whether appellant seeks a remand for consideration of whether resentencing should occur in light of Booker and Crosby.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), this Court has issued an opinion in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, No. 03-1675, 2005 WL 240916, 2005 U.S.App. LEXIS 1699 (2d Cir. Feb. 2, 2005), setting forth the procedure that we will normally follow with respect to appeals of criminal sentences rendered by district courts prior to Booker. Appellant is directed to submit to the Clerk of this Court by 5 p.m. on Monday, February 14, 2005, a one-page statement indicating whether appellant seeks a remand for consideration of whether resentencing should occur in light of Booker and Crosby.

United States v. Rodriguez, 120 F. App'x 411 (2d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

120 F. App'x 411 (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related