United States v. Rodriguez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Rodriguez

714 F. App'x 982

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 6, 2018·No. No. 17-12290 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leysmilan Rodriguez appeals his 78-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit health' care and wire fraud. The doctrine of invited error precludes Rodriguez from arguing that he was not an organizer or leader of this conspiracy: he agreed to recommend that the district court conclude he was an organizer or leader of the criminal activity in question. For background, see United States v. Love, 449 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Leysmilan Rodriguez appeals his 78-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit health' care and wire fraud. The doctrine of invited error precludes Rodriguez from arguing that he was not an organizer or leader of this conspiracy: he agreed to recommend that the district court conclude he was an organizer or leader of the criminal activity in question. For background, see United States v. Love, 449 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rodriguez, 714 F. App'x 982 (11th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

714 F. App'x 982 (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related