United States v. Rodriguez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Rodriguez

714 F. App'x 982

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 2018

DocketNo. 17-12290 Non-Argument Calendar

StatusPublished

This text of 714 F. App'x 982 (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rodriguez, 714 F. App'x 982 (11th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leysmilan Rodriguez appeals his 78-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit health' care and wire fraud. The doctrine of invited error precludes Rodriguez from arguing that he was not an organizer or leader of this conspiracy: he agreed to recommend that the district court conclude he was an organizer or leader of the criminal activity in question. For background, see United States v. Love, 449 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Leysmilan Rodriguez appeals his 78-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit health' care and wire fraud. The doctrine of invited error precludes Rodriguez from arguing that he was not an organizer or leader of this conspiracy: he agreed to recommend that the district court conclude he was an organizer or leader of the criminal activity in question. For background, see United States v. Love, 449 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

714 F. App'x 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-ca11-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack