United States v. Rodriguez-Barcenas
This text of 687 F. App'x 563 (United States v. Rodriguez-Barcenas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Angelino Rodríguez-Barcenas appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez-Barcenas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Because Rodríguez-Barcenas has fully served his sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
687 F. App'x 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-barcenas-ca9-2017.