United States v. Rodrigues

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Rodrigues

170 F.3d 881, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1850, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4120, 1999 WL 133275

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 15, 1999

DocketNo. 97-10113

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 170 F.3d 881 (United States v. Rodrigues) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rodrigues, 170 F.3d 881, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1850, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4120, 1999 WL 133275 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed on October 28, 1998 is amended as follows:

At slip op. p. 12496, first ¶ , Ins 1-2 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Stephen Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12496, third ¶, Ins 2-3 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, Ins 7 & 9 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12497, first ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Wayne T. Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, first ¶ , Ins 3-4 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, In 5 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Lamprey” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, second ¶, Ins 4 & 7 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, third ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey’s” with “The prosecutor’s”.

With these amendments, the petitions for rehearing are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI