United States v. Rodrigues

170 F.3d 881, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1850, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4120, 1999 WL 133275

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 15, 1999·No. No. 97-10113·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed on October 28, 1998 is amended as follows:

At slip op. p. 12496, first ¶ , Ins 1-2 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Stephen Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12496, third ¶, Ins 2-3 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, Ins 7 & 9 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12497, first ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Wayne T. Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, first ¶ , Ins 3-4 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, In 5 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Lamprey” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, second ¶, Ins 4 & 7 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, third ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey’s” with “The prosecutor’s”.

With these amendments, the petitions for rehearing are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI