United States v. Rodrigo Escobedo-Coronado

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 13, 2018
Docket18-40067
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Rodrigo Escobedo-Coronado (United States v. Rodrigo Escobedo-Coronado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rodrigo Escobedo-Coronado, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 18-40067 Document: 00514721401 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40067 United States Court of Appeals

Summary Calendar Fifth Circuit

FILED November 13, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODRIGO ESCOBEDO-CORONADO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1311-1

Before BENAVIDES, HIGGINSON, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rodrigo Escobedo-Coronado appeals his 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. He argues on appeal that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level enhancement under the crime of violence provision of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) (2015). Escobedo- Coronado contends that Texas aggravated assault is broader than generic aggravated assault. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-40067 Document: 00514721401 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2018

No. 18-40067

States v. Guillen-Alvarez, 489 F.3d 197 (5th Cir. 2007), but he argues that Guillen-Alvarez is contrary to other circuit decisions on this issue. This court is bound by its own precedent unless and until it is altered by the Supreme Court. See Wicker v. McCotter, 798 F.2d 155, 157-58 (5th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Rodrigo Escobedo-Coronado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodrigo-escobedo-coronado-ca5-2018.