United States v. Rodolfo Perez

377 F. App'x 637
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 2010
Docket09-50067
StatusUnpublished

This text of 377 F. App'x 637 (United States v. Rodolfo Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rodolfo Perez, 377 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rodolfo Rivas Perez appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Rivas Perez contends that the district court erred when it applied a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 because his prior conviction for lewd acts with a child under 14 years of age, in violation of California Penal Code § 288(a), does not qualify as a crime of violence. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Medina-Villa, 567 F.3d 507, 511-16 (9th Cir.2009).

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. *638 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

Rivas Perez’s petition for initial hearing en banc is denied.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as pi'ovid-ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Pablo Rivera-Sanchez
222 F.3d 1057 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Juan Carlos Herrera-Blanco
232 F.3d 715 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Medina-Villa
567 F.3d 507 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 F. App'x 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodolfo-perez-ca9-2010.