United States v. Rodney White

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 1997
Docket96-3575
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Rodney White (United States v. Rodney White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rodney White, (8th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

___________

No. 96-3575 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Rodney White, also known as * Eastern District of Missouri. Rodney Members, also know as * Paul Rogers, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

Submitted: January 23, 1997

Filed: January 31, 1997 ___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Rodney White appeals the 60-month sentence imposed by the district 1 court after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit credit card fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a) and (b)(2). White argues he should have received an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1 (1995).

We note that White fled from the police, gave false information upon his initial arrest, escaped and eluded recapture for over a year, pleaded guilty only six days before his scheduled trial, and received an obstruction-of-justice enhancement under

1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 (1995). We conclude the district court did not clearly err by denying White an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction. See United States v. Nguyen, 52 F.3d 192, 194 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1, comment. (n.1(d)) (considerations include whether defendant promptly and voluntarily surrendered to police), (n.4) (absent extraordinary circumstances, § 3C1.1 enhancement precludes § 3E1.1 reduction) (1995).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Rodney White, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodney-white-ca8-1997.