United States v. Rodney Stewart

670 F. App'x 465
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 2016
Docket14-30108
StatusUnpublished

This text of 670 F. App'x 465 (United States v. Rodney Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rodney Stewart, 670 F. App'x 465 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The government appeals from the district court’s order granting Rodney Tommie Stewart’s motion to dismiss his indictment for domestic assault by a habitual offender under 18 U.S.C. § 117(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

*466 The district court dismissed the indictment on the ground that the government could not use Stewart’s uncounseled tribal court convictions to prove an element of the offense. After the district court’s decision, the Supreme Court decided that the use of uncounseled tribal court convictions is permissible in a prosecution under section 117. See United States v. Bryant, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1954, 1966, 195 L.Ed.2d 317 (2016). We agree with the parties that remand is required under Bryant. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s order dismissing Stewart’s indictment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bryant
579 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodney-stewart-ca9-2016.