United States v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 18, 2022·No. 21-50962·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-50962 Document: 00516397292 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED July 18, 2022 No. 21-50962 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Denzell Rodgers,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:14-CR-290-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Denzell Rodgers has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodgers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-50962 Document: 00516397292 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2022

No. 21-50962

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodgers, (5th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Rodgers (United States v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)