United States v. Rodgers

88 F. App'x 29
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2004·No. No. 02-21178·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Chris lies, court-appointed counsel for Cedrick Rodgers, has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that Rodgers’s appeal does not present a nonfrivolous issue. See Dinkins v. Alabama, 526 F.2d 1268, 1269 (5th Cir.1976). Rodgers has filed a response to counsel’s motion, arguing that his appeal raises non-frivolous claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Our independent review of counsel’s Anders brief, Rodgers’s response and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The request for a COA, requested implicitly by the notice of appeal, is DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodgers, 88 F. App'x 29 (5th Cir. 2004).

88 F. App'x 29 (United States v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Dinkins v. Alabama
526 F.2d 1268 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)