United States v. Roderick Williams
This text of United States v. Roderick Williams (United States v. Roderick Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7179 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7179
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODERICK LAMAR WILLIAMS, a/k/a Rox,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00004-KDB-DSC-8)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Lamar Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7179 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Lamar Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to
correct the record under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927 F.3d 824, 826-
27 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. Williams, No. 5:03-cr-00004-KDB-DSC-8 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Roderick Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roderick-williams-ca4-2024.