United States v. Rocker

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Rocker

132 F. App'x 819

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 2, 2005·No. No. 04-16323; D.C. Docket No. 98-08135-CR-DTKH·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Adler, appointed counsel for Julius F. Rocker in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent re[820]*820view of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rocker’s conviction and sentence are AF' FIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Adler, appointed counsel for Julius F. Rocker in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent re[820]*820view of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rocker’s conviction and sentence are AF' FIRMED.

United States v. Rocker, 132 F. App'x 819 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

132 F. App'x 819 (United States v. Rocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related