United States v. Robles-Enriquez

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40389 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME ROBLES-ENRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-913-ALL --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime

Robles-Enriquez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Robles-

Enriquez has not filed a response to counsel’s motion.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.