United States v. Robledo-Teran
This text of 33 F. App'x 336 (United States v. Robledo-Teran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Genaro Robledo-Teran appeals his 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Robledo-Teran contends the district court erred by denying him a “safety [337]*337valve” reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guideline § 5C1.2 because it found he was not entirely truthful when providing information to the government. We review for clear error a district court’s factual determination of whether a particular defendant is eligible for safety valve relief. See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996). Because the record indicates Robledo-Teran provided conflicting, improbable information, we conclude the district court did not clearly err. Id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 F. App'x 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robledo-teran-ca9-2002.