United States v. Robinson
This text of 140 F. 968 (United States v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(orally). The evidence before the Board of General Appraisers shows that the merchandise in question has not been ground and polished, but has been molded, to a spherical form. In order that lenses may be embraced within the provisions of paragraph 109 of the Tariff Act of 1897 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule B, 30 Stat. 158 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1635]), it is essential that they be brought to a spherical, cylindrical or prismatic form by both grinding and polishing; and, as the evidence shows that the result has not been thus accomplished in the present case, the decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 F. 968, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robinson-circtsdny-1905.