United States v. Robinson

Opinion

Case: 24-10476 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

____________ FILED March 12, 2025

No. 24-10476

Lyle W. Cayce

Summary Calendar

Clerk

____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Sir Louis Robinson,

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:23-CR-4-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Sir Louis Robinson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Robinson has filed a response moving for the appointment of new appellate counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

_____________________

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-10476 Document: 49-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/12/2025

No. 24-10476

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Robinson’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Robinson’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).