United States v. Robinson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 F.3d 516
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2001·No. 00-20185·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20185 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KELVIN WAYNE ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-275-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Kelvin Wayne Robinson, federal

prisoner # 47475-079, has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A copy

of counsel’s motion and brief was mailed to Robinson. In

response, he has filed a motion for appointment of counsel and

has stated that he does not want to waive his right to appeal.

He has not submitted any substantive issues to be considered on

appeal of the revocation of his term of supervised release and

the resulting imposition of sentence.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-20185 -2-

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion to

withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Robinson (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)