United States v. Robinson
This text of 630 F. App'x 198 (United States v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ted Robinson appeals his conviction for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1343 (2012). Robinson has received leave to represent himself on appeal. We have reviewed Robinson’s informal brief, and conclude that the claims therein are merit-less. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Robinson’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robinson-ca4-2016.