United States v. Robin Keith

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 27, 2022
Docket21-2274
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Robin Keith (United States v. Robin Keith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robin Keith, (8th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-2274 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Robin Ray Keith

Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: April 15, 2022 Filed: July 27, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Robin Keith, who pleaded guilty to possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, received a 292-month prison sentence. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). He argues that the sentence is unreasonably long in light of the mitigating factors he presented. We conclude the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion); see also United States v. Washington, 893 F.3d 1076, 1080 (8th Cir. 2018) (explaining that a sentence within the advisory range is presumptively reasonable). The record establishes that the district court 1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, including various mitigating and aggravating circumstances. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Among them were Keith’s difficulties with addiction and his mental health, even though the court placed greater weight on the potential danger Keith posed to the public and the “serious drug quantities” he distributed. Just because Keith would have weighed these factors differently does not mean the court abused its discretion. See United States v. Hall, 825 F.3d 373, 375 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam).

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________

1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Feemster
572 F.3d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Quentin Hall
825 F.3d 373 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Frank Washington
893 F.3d 1076 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Robin Keith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robin-keith-ca8-2022.