United States v. Robertson

608 F. Supp. 2d 89, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39418, 2009 WL 1064946
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedApril 20, 2009
Docket1:08-cv-00065
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 608 F. Supp. 2d 89 (United States v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robertson, 608 F. Supp. 2d 89, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39418, 2009 WL 1064946 (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROYCE C. LAMBRETH, Chief Judge.

The Government has moved for the pretrial detention of defendants Candice Rob *90 ertson, Christopher White, and Jerome White. The Government alleges that these three defendants played key roles in obstructing justice with the respect to the trial of defendant Delante White, who was previously tried in this Court before Judge Paul Friedman on a number of federal narcotics charges in September 2008. The trial of Delante White concluded in a hung jury. Following some additional investigation by the Government, the grand jury handed down a superceding indictment charging Candice Robertson, Christopher White, and Jerome White with witness tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) and obstructing an official proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). 1 Shortly after their arraignments on the superceding indictment, the Court held three separate detention hearings for each of the defendants. With respect to all three defendants, the Court found by clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably prevent them from obstructing justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)(B). Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS defendants Candice Robertson, Christopher White, and Jerome White held without bond pending trial.

1. The Government’s Proffer

The facts proffered by the Government during the three detention hearings reveals that all three defendants worked together as part of an elaborate scheme to obstruct justice in the September 2008 trial of Delante White. In that trial, Delante White was charged with possession with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of crack cocaine in the District of Columbia in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 841(b)(l)(A)(iii). Much of the Government’s evidence at trial was obtained during a search of 637 Hamlin Street, Apt. 2, Northeast, Washington DC on February 23, 2008. The Hamlin Street apartment belonged to Evelyn Clowney, the grandmother of Delante White and a key witness for the Government’s case. Among the evidence seized during the search of Evelyn Clowney’s apartment was crack cocaine, a digital scale, and a number of key items tending to link Delante White to the apartment at 637 Hamlin Street. As Delante White was not present during the search of the 637 Hamlin Street residence, the Government proceeded at trial on a theory of construction possession.

The defense theory at trial was that Delante White’s brother, Jerome White, lived at 637 Hamlin Street with their grandmother, Evelyn Clowney, and that it was actually Jerome, not Delante, who dealt cocaine from that residence. In other words, the Government had mistaken Delante for his brother Jerome, who, according to the defense, was the actual drug dealer in the family. To help create the illusion that Jerome White, rather than his brother Delante, was responsible for the crack cocaine found at 637 Hamlin Street, Delante’s girlfriend, Candice Robertson, along with Delante’s brothers, Christopher and Jerome White, manufactured false evidence, produced perjured testimony, and prevented Evelyn Clowney from testifying at trial.

It was Candice Robertson who coordinated and led the efforts to undermine the criminal prosecution of Delante White; she acted in accordance with instructions issued by Delante White, who was detained pending his trial. Among other efforts, Candice Robertson paid money to witnesses to provide false testimony to investigators and prosecutors. Additionally, the Government claims to have evidence *91 that at least one defense witness was paid by Candice Robertson for false testimony at trial. Candice Robertson also allegedly organized meetings with witnesses in order to ensure that all witnesses in the case would testify consistent with the fabricated defense theory.

The lengths to which these three defendants went to obstruct justice is truly extraordinary and utterly disturbing. One of the more alarming instance of obstruction alleged in this case concerns the disappearance of Evelyn Clowney, one of the Government’s most crucial witnesses. To place the issue in context, it is important to understand that Ms. Clowney is an elderly woman, and she is confined, to a wheel chair because both of her legs have been amputated below the knees. Candice Robertson not only lied to both prosecutors and investigators about Evelyn Clowney’s whereabouts, but she paid money for Ms. Clowney to leave town, and ultimately enlisted the help of both Christopher White and Jerome White, who forcibly removed Ms. Clowney from her home and ensured that she remained in an unknown location during trial. These defendants successfully frustrated the Government’s efforts to locate Ms. Clowney during the trial, and this Court was ultimately forced to issue a material witness warrant for Ms. Clowney’s arrest. Ms. Clowney was subsequently located outside of this jurisdiction and detained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The defendants’ far-flung obstruction efforts reached far beyond tampering with witnesses. Perhaps the most disturbing example of obstruction in this case concerns fabricated photographic evidence, which was introduced at trial through the perjured testimony of Christopher White. Three fabricated photographs that were provided to the jury in conjunction with the perjured testimony of Christopher White proved critical to the defense case at trial. The staged photographs, which were facilitated by Candice Robertson, purport to show a belated Valentine’s Day celebration at Ms. Clowney’s apartment on February 21, 2008, a mere three days before the Metropolitan Police Department executed a search on that residence. Christopher White testified at trial regarding the Valentine’s Day gathering, and he claimed that he took the photographs then. In the photographs, Jerome White is clearly visible in the background and appears to be cutting up cocaine. When testifying about the photographs at trial, Christopher White claimed that when he snapped the photograph, he did not realize at the time that Jerome White was in the background tending to cocaine.

Several months following the trial, Christopher White admitted to federal law enforcement authorities that the photographs he authenticated and testified about at the trial were complete fabrications. The photographs were in fact taken approximately one week prior to the start of Delante White’s trial. In fact, Christopher White, who is a resident of North Carolina, was not even in the District of Columbia on February 21, 2008. The photographs were completely staged and created for the sole purpose of misleading the jury to the false conclusion that it was Delante White’s juvenile brother, Jerome, who actually used his grandmother’s apartment to store and sell crack cocaine.

These three key defense photographs were staged fabrications down to the slightest detail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Degrave
District of Columbia, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 F. Supp. 2d 89, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39418, 2009 WL 1064946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robertson-dcd-2009.