United States v. Roberts

D. Oregon

United States v. Roberts

875 F. Supp. 1437, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20171, 1994 WL 762519

CourtDistrict Court, D. Oregon

DecidedDecember 21, 1994

DocketNo. CR 92-127-JO

StatusPublished

This text of 875 F. Supp. 1437 (United States v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Roberts, 875 F. Supp. 1437, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20171, 1994 WL 762519 (D. Or. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

The court has received the defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside his conviction on the grounds of double jeopardy and moves for his immediate release from custody. The motions are denied.

The defendant’s forfeiture occurred after the time of the defendant’s criminal jeopardy, which was when he entered his plea of guilty. [1438]*1438This decision is based upon this court’s opinion in United States v. Martin Hobart Stanwood, No. CR 91-279-JO, 1994 WL 25815 (1994), USDC Oregon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

The court has received the defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside his conviction on the grounds of double jeopardy and moves for his immediate release from custody. The motions are denied.

The defendant’s forfeiture occurred after the time of the defendant’s criminal jeopardy, which was when he entered his plea of guilty. [1438]*1438This decision is based upon this court’s opinion in United States v. Martin Hobart Stanwood, No. CR 91-279-JO, 1994 WL 25815 (1994), USDC Oregon.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

875 F. Supp. 1437, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20171, 1994 WL 762519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roberts-ord-1994.