United States v. Roberts

D. Oregon

United States v. Roberts

875 F. Supp. 1437, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20171, 1994 WL 762519

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided December 21, 1994·No. No. CR 92-127-JO·Published

Opinion

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

The court has received the defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside his conviction on the grounds of double jeopardy and moves for his immediate release from custody. The motions are denied.

The defendant’s forfeiture occurred after the time of the defendant’s criminal jeopardy, which was when he entered his plea of guilty. [1438] This decision is based upon this court’s opinion in United States v. Martin Hobart Stanwood, No. CR 91-279-JO, 1994 WL 25815 (1994), USDC Oregon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

The court has received the defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside his conviction on the grounds of double jeopardy and moves for his immediate release from custody. The motions are denied.

The defendant’s forfeiture occurred after the time of the defendant’s criminal jeopardy, which was when he entered his plea of guilty. [1438] This decision is based upon this court’s opinion in United States v. Martin Hobart Stanwood, No. CR 91-279-JO, 1994 WL 25815 (1994), USDC Oregon.

United States v. Roberts, 875 F. Supp. 1437, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20171, 1994 WL 762519 (D. Or. 1994).

Pincite

875 F. Supp. 1437 (United States v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.