United States v. Roberts

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6381

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAUL ANDERSON ROBERTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-81, CA-97-517-2)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING,* Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Anderson Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this case. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1994). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Paul Anderson Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Roberts, Nos. CR-96-81;

CA-97-517-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED