United States v. Roberto Osuna-Sanchez, Manuel Aguirre-Barrera and Francisco Villa-Flores

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Roberto Osuna-Sanchez, Manuel Aguirre-Barrera and Francisco Villa-Flores

431 F.2d 709

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1970

Docket25934

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 431 F.2d 709 (United States v. Roberto Osuna-Sanchez, Manuel Aguirre-Barrera and Francisco Villa-Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Roberto Osuna-Sanchez, Manuel Aguirre-Barrera and Francisco Villa-Flores, 431 F.2d 709 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The United States appeals from an order suppressing evidence obtained from a warrantless search of an automobile following lawful arrest. The order was entered by the District Court on the authority of this court’s holding in Heffley v. Hocker, 420 F.2d 881 (9th Cir. 1969). In that case certiorari to the Supreme Court was granted and the case was remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970). Upon remand this court, on the authority of Chambers, held the search there involved to be valid. Heffley v. Hocker, 429 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1970).

The search here in question presents no distinguishing circumstances. Under Chambers v. Maroney, supra, the search here, as was the one in Heffley v. Hocker, was valid.

Reversed and remanded with instructions that the order suppressing evidence be vacated and for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The United States appeals from an order suppressing evidence obtained from a warrantless search of an automobile following lawful arrest. The order was entered by the District Court on the authority of this court’s holding in Heffley v. Hocker, 420 F.2d 881 (9th Cir. 1969). In that case certiorari to the Supreme Court was granted and the case was remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970). Upon remand this court, on the authority of Chambers, held the search there involved to be valid. Heffley v. Hocker, 429 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1970).

The search here in question presents no distinguishing circumstances. Under Chambers v. Maroney, supra, the search here, as was the one in Heffley v. Hocker, was valid.

Reversed and remanded with instructions that the order suppressing evidence be vacated and for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

431 F.2d 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roberto-osuna-sanchez-manuel-aguirre-barrera-and-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack