United States v. Robert W. Hill
This text of 47 F.3d 1171 (United States v. Robert W. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
47 F.3d 1171
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert W. HILL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-3051.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 18, 1995.
Before: ENGEL, KENNEDY, and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The defendant appeals a district court order denying his motion for release pending sentencing and moves for emergency consideration of his appeal. The government has filed a response.
The defendant has entered a plea of guilty on charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956(g) and engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 848. He is, therefore, subject to the mandatory detention provision contained in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3143(a)(2). A person subject to detention under this section may be ordered released if the conditions of release set forth in Sec. 3143(a)(1) are met and "it is clearly shown that there are exceptional reasons why such person's detention would not be appropriate." 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3145(c). Upon review of the facts and arguments presented, we conclude that the defendant has not demonstrated exceptional reasons which would entitle him to such release.
It is therefore ORDERED that the district court's decision denying release is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F.3d 1171, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12463, 1995 WL 19367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-w-hill-ca6-1995.