United States v. Robert Theodore Oakcrum
This text of 441 F.2d 1157 (United States v. Robert Theodore Oakcrum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Theodore Oakerum appeals from his convictions of possession and interstate transportation of a firearm (“a sawed-off shotgun”) not registered under the National Firearms Act, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d) and (j). Upon appeal, Oakerum contends: (1) that the registration provisions of the Act are an unconstitutional infringement upon the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to show possession or interstate transportation of the firearm in question; and (3) that the sentences were excessive.
Appellant’s constitutional challenge to the Act has been foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971), wherein the Court held that the Act does not violate the self-incrimination provision of the Fifth Amendment.
We find no merit in appellant’s other contentions. Clearly there was sufficient evidence to show possession and interstate transportation of the firearm. The sentences imposed were well within the statutory limits and there is no reason to disturb them as we perceive no abuse of discretion by the sentencing court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 F.2d 1157, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-theodore-oakcrum-ca4-1971.