United States v. Robert Teachey
This text of 14 F.3d 598 (United States v. Robert Teachey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
14 F.3d 598
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert TEACHEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6966.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 23, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Robert Teachey, pro se.
Stephen Scott Zimmerman, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Teachey, Nos. CR-90-377-S; CA-93-2381-S (D. Md. Aug. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F.3d 598, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37083, 1993 WL 533410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-teachey-ca4-1993.