United States v. Robert Seaman Drabeck, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Robert Seaman Drabeck, Jr.

915 F.2d 1404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17882, 1990 WL 151303

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robert Seaman Drabeck, Jr.. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 F.2d 629 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 11, 1990·No. 89-30237·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

The mandate is recalled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

The mandate is recalled.

United States v. Robert Seaman Drabeck, Jr., 915 F.2d 1404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17882, 1990 WL 151303 (9th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

915 F.2d 1404 (United States v. Robert Seaman Drabeck, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.