United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart

204 F.3d 581, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2284, 2000 WL 192585
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 2000
Docket98-30547
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 204 F.3d 581 (United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart, 204 F.3d 581, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2284, 2000 WL 192585 (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Carroll
227 F.3d 486 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Reinhart
Fifth Circuit, 2000

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 F.3d 581, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2284, 2000 WL 192585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-randall-reinhart-ca5-2000.