United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart

204 F.3d 581, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2284, 2000 WL 192585

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2000·No. 98-30547·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart, 204 F.3d 581, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2284, 2000 WL 192585 (5th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

204 F.3d 581 (United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related