United States v. Robert Pitner, United States of America v. David M. Hanson

23 F.3d 1497, 94 Daily Journal DAR 6055, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3188, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9572

Opinion

23 F.3d 1497

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert PITNER, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David M. HANSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 4, 1994.

J. Frank McCabe, Goorjian & McCabe, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Robert Pitner.

Juliana Drous, Tamburello, Hanlon & Brescianai, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant David Hanson.

Eric J. Swenson, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and BURNS,* Senior District Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Supreme Court's decision in Pitner v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), and Hanson v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), we hereby withdraw the opinion, see 979 F.2d 156 (9th Cir.1993), and unpublished memorandum, see Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 1992), in the above-captioned cases.

Further, we reverse and remand the appellants' cases for a new trial consistent with Ratzlaf v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

* The Honorable James M. Burns, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation