United States v. Robert Paul Gagnon, Pedro Valenzuela, Donald P. Storms, Glenn E. Martin
This text of 764 F.2d 1324 (United States v. Robert Paul Gagnon, Pedro Valenzuela, Donald P. Storms, Glenn E. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert Paul GAGNON, Pedro Valenzuela, Donald P. Storms,
Glenn E. Martin, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 82-1289, 82-1310, 82-1311 and 82-1350.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 2, 1985.
Negatu Molla, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.
Robert S. Wolkin, Stephen C. Villarreal, Micahel L. Piccarreta, Davis, Siegel & Gugino, L. Anthony Fines, Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants.
Before WISDOM,* SKOPIL and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.ORDER
In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in United States v. Robert Paul Gagnon, et al., --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1482, 84 L.Ed.2d 486 (1985), the judgment of convictions of all the defendants is
AFFIRMED.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Hon. John Minor Wisdom, Senior Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 F.2d 1324, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-paul-gagnon-pedro-valenzuel-ca9-1985.